Images
Up: Data Products Sections: Images - Object lists - Spectra - Tiling
Getting and using images
The Data Archive Server provides the survey images, called
"corrected frames", as fpC*.fits files. See the fpC data model.
The Catalog Archive
Server serves 3-color jpeg images generated from the g, r,
i images as finding charts, cutouts for object lists and for
point-and-click navigation of the sky.
The data access page contains various
query forms to get images by coordinates, or to search for
objects from the imaging and spectroscopic catalogs by redshift,
object magnitude, color etc., and to retrieve the corresponding
data from the archive.
There is a separate set of fpAtlas*.fits
files, containing the "postage-stamp" images for individual objects
from the photometric object
lists. See how to read an atlas
image.
Caveats
Overestimation of sky levels near
bright galaxies
Because of scattered light (see the EDR paper [Stoughton
et al. 2002]), the background sky in the SDSS images is
non-uniform on arc-minute scales. The photometric pipeline determines
the median sky value within each 100" square on a grid with
50" spacing, and bilinearly interpolates this sky value to each
pixel. This biases the sky bright near large extended galaxies, and
as was already reported in the DR4 paper and (Mandelbaum
et al. 2005), causes a systematic decrease in the number density
of faint objects near bright galaxies. In addition, it also strongly
affects the photometry of the bright galaxies themselves, as has been
reported by Lauer et
al. (2007), Bernardi et
al. (2007), and Lisker et
al. (2007).
We have quantified this effect by adding simulated galaxies (with
exponential or de Vaucouleurs) profiles to SDSS images. The simulated
galaxies ranged from apparent magnitude mr=12 to
mr=19 in half-magnitude steps, with a one-to-one
mapping from mr to Sersic half-light radius
determined using the mean observed relation between these quantities
for Main sample galaxies with exponential and de Vaucouleurs profiles.
Axis ratios of 0.5 and 1 were used, with random
position angle for the non-circular simulated galaxies. The results
in the r band are shown in the Figure, showing the
difference between the input magnitude and the model magnitude
returned by the SDSS photometric pipeline, as a function of
magnitude.
Also shown is the fractional error in the scale size
re. The biases are significant to
r=16 for late-type galaxies, and to r=17.5 for
early-type galaxies. Also shown is the results of a separate analysis
by by Hyde & Bernardi (unpublished) who fit deVaucouleurs models to
SDSS images of extended elliptical galaxies, using their own sky
subtraction algorithm, which is less likely to overestimate the sky
level near extended sources. Their results are quite consistent with
the simulations.
Upper panel: The error
in the r band model magnitude of simulated galaxies with an
n=1 (exponential) profile (blue hexagons) and an
n=4 (de Vaucouleurs) profile (red crosses) as determined by
the photometric pipeline, as a function of magnitude. Fifteen
galaxies are simulated at each magnitude for each profile. Also shown
are the analogous results from Hyde & Bernardi (unpublished) for three
early-type galaxy samples: 54 nearby (z<0.03) early-type
galaxies from the ENEAR catalog (da Costa et
al. 2000) in black; 280 brightest cluster galaxies from the C4
catalog (Miller et
al. 2005) in green; and 9000 early-type galaxies from the Bernardi et
al. (2003a) analysis in magenta. Lower panel: The
fractional error in the scale size re as a
function of magnitude from the simulations and the Hyde & Bernardi
analysis.
Bad CCD columns Some chips have bad CCD columns
which get interpolated over by the photometric pipeline, leading
to noticeably correlated noise. The bad columns for each run are
currently available in fpM*.fits. These files can be
found on the Data Archive Server in the objcs
subdirectory of each run/rerun directory (e.g., http://das.sdss.org/DR6/data/imaging/1740/40/objcs/1/. See
how to read fpM*.fits
image masks.
Very red objects
The u filter has a natural red leak around 7100 Å
which is supposed to be blocked by an interference coating. However,
under the vacuum in the camera, the wavelength cutoff of the
interference coating has shifted redward (see the discussion in the
EDR paper), allowing some of this red leak through. The extent of
this contamination is different for each camera column. It is not
completely clear if the effect is deterministic; there is some
evidence that it is variable from one run to another with very similar
conditions in a given camera column. Roughly speaking, however, this
is a 0.02 magnitude effect in the u magnitudes for mid-K
stars (and galaxies of similar color), increasing to 0.06 magnitude
for M0 stars (r-i ~ 0.5), 0.2 magnitude at r-i ~
1.2, and 0.3 magnitude at r-i = 1.5. There is a large
dispersion in the red leak for the redder stars, caused by three
effects:
- The differences in the detailed red
leak response from column to column, beating with the complex red
spectra of these objects.
- The almost certain time variability of the red leak.
- The red-leak images on the u chips are out of focus and are
not centered at the same place as the u image because of
lateral color in the optics and differential refraction - this means
that the fraction of the red-leak flux recovered by the PSF fitting
depends on the amount of centroid displacement.
To make matters even more complicated, this is a detector
effect. This means that it is not the real i and
z which drive the excess, but the instrumental colors
(i.e., including the effects of atmospheric extinction), so the leak
is worse at high airmass, when the true ultraviolet flux is heavily
absorbed but the infrared flux is relatively unaffected. Given these
complications, we cannot recommend a specific correction to the
u-band magnitudes of red stars, and warn the user of these
data about over-interpreting results on colors involving the
u band for stars later than K.
u-band sky
There is a slight and only recently recognized downward bias in the
determination of the sky level in the photometry, at the level of
roughly 0.1 DN per pixel. This is apparent if one compares
large-aperture and PSF photometry of faint stars; the bias is of order
29 mag arcsec-2 in r. This, together with
scattered light problems in the u band, can cause of order
10% errors in the u band Petrosian fluxes of large
galaxies.
Last modified: Thu Oct 18 09:21:04 CEST 2007
|