The SDSS Data Release 2 (DR2)
Contents
What DR2 contains
The DR2 imaging data cover 3324 square degrees, and include
information on roughly 88 million objects. The DR2 spectroscopic data
include data from 574 plates of 640 spectra each, and cover 2627
square degrees.
The DR2 footprint is defined by all non-repeating survey-quality
imaging runs within the a priori defined elliptical survey area in the
Nothern Galactic Cap, and three stripes in the Southern Galactic Cap
obtained prior to 1 July 2002, and the spectroscopy associated with
that area obtained before that date. In fact, 34 square degrees of
DR2 imaging data in the Nothern Galactic Cap lie outside this ellipse.
While the DR2 scans do not repeat a given area of sky, they do overlap
to some extent, and the data in the overlaps are included in DR1 as
well. The DR2 includes reprocessing of all data included in DR1, and
those data in EDR that pass our data-quality criteria for the official
survey. The sky coverage of the imaging and spectroscopic data that
make up DR2 are given on the coverage
page. The natural unit of imaging data is a run; the DR2 contains
data from 105 runs in the best database, and 105 runs in the target
database. The DR2 includes all data released as part of the EDR and
DR1, reprocessed as described below.
A total of 183 square degrees of sky are different runs between target
and best, the majority along the Equatorial Stripe in the Fall sky.
Improvements to image processing
Model magnitudes
There was a serious bug in the computation of model magnitudes in
the DR1 and EDR processing, having to do with the model of the PSF
used. This bug caused systematic errors in the derived scale sizes
of galaxies, and caused model magnitudes of bright galaxies to be
systematically incorrect. This has now been fixed in DR2. See the
description of
model magnitudes in the Photometry section of algorithms
for a detailed discussion of this problem and its fix. Which
magnitudes should I use has further discussion of which
magnitudes to use when. The changes in the model magnitudes
have also necessitated changes in the
target selection for Luminous Red Galaxies.
The deblender
The behavior of the deblender of overlapping images has been
further improved since the DR1; these changes are most important for bright
galaxies of large angular extent (> 1′). In the EDR,
and to a lesser extent in the DR1, bright galaxies were occasionally
"shredded" by the deblender, i.e., interpreted as two or more
objects and taken apart. With improvements in the code that finds
the center of large galaxies in the presence of superposed stars, and
the deblending of stars superposed on galaxies, this shredding now
rarely happens.
Improvements to PSF modelling
The PSF is measured from atlas images roughly 7" across
for stars; any error in the sky level determined from these images
couples to spatial variability of the PSF by the
Karhunen-Loève expansion used to model the PSF. This manifested
itself in systematic offsets between the PSF and model magnitudes of
stars of several hundredths of a magnitude, even with the fixes in the
model magnitude code described above. This zero-point term in the PSF
is now explicitly suppressed.
The pixel size is 0.396", giving well-sampled
images for the typical seeing of 1" or more. On rare
occasions when the seeing became much better than
0.9" (FWHM), the undersampling causes the code that
found stars suitable for determining the PSF to miss many
objects, yielding an incorrect
PSF and therefore poor stellar photometry (the seeing was never good
enough in the runs included in DR1, so this error was not triggered).
Changes to the thresholds for the selection of PSF stars have solved this problem.
Photometry of saturated objects
When an image is saturated in the SDSS imaging data, the wells
overflow and a bleed trail results. However, the total number of
electrons associated with the object, bleed trail and all, still at
least approximately reflects the brightness of the object. For
objects for which the flag HAS_SATUR_DN is set in a
given band, the imaging pipeline includes the counts associated
with the bleed trail of saturated objects in flux measurements.
In particular, the fiber, Petrosian, PSF, and model magnitudes
include this light, and it is added to the central value of the
radial profile (i.e., profMean[0] ). As the
pipeline works on a single frame at a time, bleed trails that
cross frame boundaries will not be properly accounted for. In
addition, the fluxes of close pairs of saturated stars whose
saturated regions overlap will not be correct.
Astrometry of objects not detected in r
Astrometry for each object is referred to the reference frame of
the r-band images. DR1 had a bug in the reported right ascension and
declination (and all other celestial coordinates, such as l and b) for
those rare sources that are not detected in the r band (for
example, cool brown dwarfs and z > 5.7 quasars). This bug has been
fixed in DR2 and the positions of z-band only detections
are now correct.
Improved proper motions
The EDR and DR1 match each SDSS object to the nearest object in
USNO-A2.0 (Monet
et al. 1998), using a 30" matching radius.
USNO-A2.0 provides positions at a single epoch (no proper motions are
provided), based on POSS-I plates. Proper motions are then calculated based
on the SDSS and POSS-I positions, with a typical time baseline of 50 years.
For motions greater than ≈40 mas/year, corresponding to
separations between the SDSS and USNO-A2.0 positions of greater than
2 arcsec, contamination by false matches becomes significant and
rises with increasing motion/separation. The DR2 reductions use
USNO-B1.0 (Monet
et al. 2003), which provides positions and proper motions based on various Schmidt
photographic surveys (primarily POSS-I and POSS-II in the area of sky
covered by SDSS). Each SDSS object is matched to the nearest USNO-B1.0 object
within 1", after first converting the USNO-B1.0
positions to the epoch of the SDSS observations. This
eliminates nearly all of the false matches, yielding much cleaner
samples of high proper motion stars. The USNO-B1.0
proper motion is then given for each matching SDSS
object.
Imaging caveats
Red leak to the u filter and very red objects
The u filter has a natural red leak around 7100 Å
which is supposed to be blocked by an interference coating. However,
under the vacuum in the camera, the wavelength cutoff of the
interference coating has shifted redward (see the discussion in the
EDR paper), allowing some of this red leak through. The extent of
this contamination is different for each camera column. It is not
completely clear if the effect is deterministic; there is some
evidence that it is variable from one run to another with very similar
conditions in a given camera column. Roughly speaking, however, this
is a 0.02 magnitude effect in the u magnitudes for mid-K
stars (and galaxies of similar color), increasing to 0.06 magnitude
for M0 stars (r-i ~ 0.5), 0.2 magnitude at r-i ~
1.2, and 0.3 magnitude at r-i = 1.5. There is a large
dispersion in the red leak for the redder stars, caused by three
effects:
- The differences in the detailed red
leak response from column to column, beating with the complex red
spectra of these objects.
- The almost certain time variability of the red leak.
- The red-leak images on the u chips are out of focus and are
not centered at the same place as the u image because of
lateral color in the optics and differential refraction - this means
that the fraction of the red-leak flux recovered by the PSF fitting
depends on the amount of centroid displacement.
To make matters even more complicated, this is a detector
effect. This means that it is not the real i and
z which drive the excess, but the instrumental colors
(i.e., including the effects of atmospheric extinction), so the leak
is worse at high airmass, when the true ultraviolet flux is heavily
absorbed but the infrared flux is relatively unaffected. Given these
complications, we cannot recommend a specific correction to the
u-band magnitudes of red stars, and warn the user of these
data about over-interpreting results on colors involving the
u band for stars later than K.
Bias in sky determination
There is a slight and only recently recognized downward bias in the
determination of the sky level in the phot ometry, at the level of
roughly 0.1 DN per pixel. This is apparent if one compares
large-aperture and PSF photometry of faint stars; the bias is of order
29 mag arcsec-2 in r. This, together with
scattered light problems in the u band, can cause of order
10% errors in the u band Petrosian fluxes of large
galaxies.
Zeropoint of the photometric system
The SDSS photometry is intended to be on the AB system (Oke
& Gunn 1983), by which a magnitude 0 object should have the
same counts as a source of Fnu =
3631 Jy. However, this is known not to be exactly true, such that the
photometric zeropoints are slightly off the AB standard. We continue
to work to pin down these shifts. Our present estimate, based on
comparison to the STIS standards of Bohlin,
Dickinson, & Calzetti~(2001) and confirmed by SDSS photometry and
spectroscopy of fainter hot white dwarfs, is that the u
band zeropoint is in error by 0.04 mag, uAB =
uSDSS - 0.04 mag, and that g, r, and
i are close to AB. These statements are certainly not
precise to better than 0.01 mag; in addition, they depend critically
on the system response of the SDSS 2.5-meter, which was measured by
Doi et al. (2004, in preparation). The z band zeropoint is
not as certain at this time, but there is mild evidence that it may be
shifted by about 0.02 mag in the sense zAB =
zSDSS + 0.02 mag. The large shift in the
u band was expected because the adopted magnitude of the
SDSS standard BD+17 in Fukugita
et al.(1996) was computed at zero airmass, thereby making the
assumed u response bluer than that of the USNO system
response.
Holes in the imaging data
About 0.3% of the DR2 imaging footprint area (about 300 out of
100,000 fields, or 10/square degree) for DR2 are marked as
holes. These are indicated in the CAS by setting
quality=5 (HOLE) in the tsField file and
field table and given in the list of quality holes, which
contains further details about the holes and quality flags.
Problems with one u chip
The u chip in the third column of the camera is read out
on two amplifiers. On occasion, electronic problems on this chip
caused one of the two amplifiers to fail, meaning that half the chip
has no detected objects on it. This was a problem for only two of the
105 imaging runs included in DR2: run 2190, which includes a total of
360 frames in two separate contiguous pieces on strip 12N (centered
roughly at delta = +5 degrees in the North Galactic Cap; NGC), and run
2189, which includes 76 frames on stripe 36N near the northern
boundary of the contiguous area in the NGC. The relevant frames are
flagged as bad in the quality flag; in addition,
individual objects in this region have the u band flagged
as NOTCHECKED_CENTER (or, for objects which straddle the
boundary between the two amplifiers, LOCAL_EDGE ). Richards
et al (2002) describe how the quasar selection algorithm handles
such data; the net effect is that no quasars are selected by the
ugri branch of the algorithm for these data.
Improvements to spectroscopic data processing
Improvements in spectrophotometry
There have been three substantial improvements to the algorithms
which photometrically calibrate the spectra: (1) improved matching of
observed standard stars to models; (2) tying the spectrophotometry
directly to the r-band fiber magnitudes measured by the most recent
version of the photometric pipeline; and (3) no longer using the
"smear" exposures. These are described in detail on the algorithms page for
spectrophotometry. These changes result in rms differences
between synthesized photometry from the spectra, and the directly
measured photometry, of 0.04 mag. The improvements also remove a
number of unphysical wiggles which appeared in the blue end of the
spectra.
Improvements in radial velocities
An error in the radial velocity templates for some types of stars
caused systematic errors of up to 40 km/s in the EDR and DR1; these
have now been fixed in DR2. The quality of radial velocities is
described in detail under quality of stellar radial
velocities.
Spectroscopy caveats
Note about galactic extinction correction
The EDR and DR1 data nominally corrected for galactic extinction.
The spectrophotometry in DR2 is vastly improved compared to DR1, but
the final calibrated DR2 spectra are not corrected for
foreground Galactic reddening (a relatively small effect; the median
E(B-V) over the survey is 0.034). This may be changed in
future data releases. Users of spectra should note, though, that the
fractional improvement in spectrophotometry is much greater than the
extinction correction itself.
Problematic plates
A small number of plates suffered from a variety of minor problems
affecting the quality of the spectrophotometry (but not of
redshifts). See the list under Plates with
problematic spectrophotometry on the data products page for
spectra.
Mismatches between the spectroscopic and imaging data
For various reasons, a total of 663 spectroscopic objects do not
have a counterpart in the best object catalogs, 0.2% of
the total. See the caveat about mismatches
between spectra and images on the data products page for spectra.
Advanced features not yet available in DR2
There are a number of advanced features or data products that are
not yet available in DR2, but will be in the near future.
- Photometric redshifts for galaxies The DR1 Catalog Archive Server had a
table with photometric redshifts for galaxies, including galaxies
fainter than those in the spectroscopic survey. The redshifts
still need to be computed and loaded into the database for DR2.
- Coverage masks Detailed coverage masks which
will allow large-scale structure resarchers to easily calculate
power spectrum and related quantities are in preparation.
- IQS/SQS The Imaging
Query Server (IQS) and Spectro
Query Server (SQS) form interfaces have been re-enginered to
use a faster database. They currently do not provide a direct
link to the DAS data
download form; users need to save .csv files with the
necessary information and upload these by hand to the DAS form.
Last modified: Thu Jun 3 16:41:54 CDT 2004
|